I play games very rarely because I’m hard to please, but I liked this game.
When I saw the picture, I thought it was a children’s game, but it made me sweat, I played on the minimum difficulty level, and even asked me several times for help in passing difficult places.
The gameplay is addictive, it captivates with its incredible mechanics of collecting different weapons, upgrading them, as well as exploring various locations, collecting cards, and completing main and secondary missions.
Let’s take a closer look at the Weapons, they are very diverse and original, just look at the kickotron, when used, all the enemies start dancing, each has their own dance style, it’s very funny.
Also an interesting weapon is the pixelator, which turns my enemies into 2D models, like in some Duma of the 90s.
The graphics are like in some cartoon, the developers have tried very hard, there are a lot of small details, all the levels have been worked out. Enemy models are varied, each planet has different types. The animation looks great, all the effects, explosions, flying gears, sooo juicy and beautiful.
I would like to note the animation of the enemies, all movements are smooth, I repeat, like in a cartoon. This concept can be used for everything in this game.
A solid ten for the visual.
Gameplay. There are many unusual mechanics, for example puzzles with Clank, these are simple tasks related to dragging robots, which simply over time acquire a small number of details, it is interesting to play, but very scary, because I worry about Clank in those places where the robot is chasing him. There are also airplane flights and local skateboard races. The mechanics are simple, but add additional variety to the game.
The additional missions are interesting, the research component of this game is built competently, you want to get into every nook and cranny and this makes you stay on each planet with interest for a long time.
The plot is simple but interesting. There are no unpredictable twists. They have no use for this game. I’ll highlight jokes that are sometimes even funny. The game is entirely in Russian, and this is a huge plus, you are not distracted by subtitles, and you can be completely immersed in what is happening. The voice acting is very high quality.
The characters are interesting, be it the naive and very welcoming Ratchet, the narcissistic Captain Quark, or the charismatic main villain Nefarious.
Overall, I really liked the game, I was happy to spend my time playing through it. I recommend it to everyone, It is suitable for both children and adults. Ratchet & Clank will not leave indifferent anyone who loves animated cartoons.
Ratchet & Clank (2016)
Best comments
By this I meant that the screensaver is made from effects (assets) not produced/ordered in-house, it is clear that making your own screensaver is an extremely labor-intensive process or expensive, well, here, in general, it’s a nitpick, because the content after the screensaver is more important. All I can say about him is that he is boring… most likely this is dictated by the category of content itself and there is nothing much to be done about it – and making a comparison, for example, with the pros is absolutely absurd. About 5-6 years ago, I was quite impressed by the whole YT movement – and thought about making my own channel… and the first thing I did was riveted: “Against the background of fire, text-nickname with input/exit” in Vegas, threw the whole thing.To. I don’t understand what to show me. It looked much simpler – but in principle, the tutorials were a little more complicated back then… I don’t even understand how I was able to figure it all out then haha :)
I’m slowly bringing you to the conclusion that the screensaver from a design point of view turned out to be quite banal – I had the same idea when I was still a schoolboy.
Commendable. Be prepared that https://palpitoscasino.co.uk/bonus/ the promotion of this business will take several years at best, and that’s if you’re lucky. I’ll leave the channel of this YouTube old-timer who dismantles “TyTruba” as a secondary project and conducts his main activities there on another “very popular channel in the ru-segment” – I think he’ll teach something useful.
The screensaver was made in After Effect, and not according to templates, as best I could. Installation, I think it will get better with experience, Moscow was not built right away. About the “argument” – I’ll say this, I’m not just trying, but I’m doing something that I like and want to grow in it. Why criticism for the sake of criticism?? You don’t like it, but someone likes it, to each their own. Thanks for the negative but still interest
Including those two complaints from users above, I can highlight the lack of text checking, because there are both simple typos and problems with punctuation. The small volume of text also contributes to the feeling that the text was created in a hurry. A rather superficial description of the mechanics, plot, visual component.
As I understand it, the game can be addictive with collecting weapons, leveling them up, collecting cards, studying locations, and also
I wonder what good single player game will not have main missions, the main goal?
Could have said a lot more about the game. But judging by the tags “game industry news”, “what to play”, “top games”, “fun”, then we can assure you that this is not a review. In this case, my claims can be considered meaningless.
Then, author, you need to decide what exactly you are writing.
When the entire text fits on one and a half A4 pages, then something is wrong here
And take into account the other side of the coin – it looks like I have about 10 pages on Beholder, no matter how short it is.
Of course, I understand everything, but this name of the blog and the font on the preview, like 95% of beginner YouTubers, can mislead SG users, which is why many will think that this is another blog with self-promotion of a channel on YouTube.
But this could be just another blog with self-promotion on YouTube. =)
I can’t help but feel like I’ve seen this somewhere before.
About personal burning: it seems to me that the volume of text should be looked at by the number of characters/words, and not by pages. A large variation occurs depending on the font, size and the size of any intervals. But this is so, by the way, from a bore. 🙂
It’s necessary, but it’s clearer this way. Plus I took the classic Times New Roman, the fourteenth font.
If I follow your advice and look at the number of characters and words,
Glad to see that we respect. It’s a pity that the author is not very responsive in the comments section of his blog.
I don’t have much to add about the blog, M’sieur “The Mad Fox Is Alive” laid it all out, according to the jury of the video:
1. The editing is faceless, just like the screensaver made from templates.
2. In general, there is nothing special, just some tricks.
There are a lot of such videos on YouTube, and the argument “I just tried to do it for myself” doesn’t work.To. Why bother distributing it then??